Nigerian author Chimamanda Adichie has threatened to take legal action against Euracare hospital in Lagos of medical negligence and misconduct following the death of her 21-month-old son, Nkanu Nnamdi, after medical procedures.
In a detailed legal notice dated January 10, 2026, issued by solicitors representing Adichie and her partner, Dr Ivara Esege, alleged that the hospital, its anaesthesiologist, and attending medical personnel breached the duty of care owed to their son, Master Nkanu Adichie-Esege, who died in the early hours of January 7, 2026.
The notice states that the child, born on March 25, 2024, was referred to the hospital on January 6, 2026, from Atlantis Pediatric Hospital for diagnostic and preparatory procedures.
These procedures included an echocardiogram, brain MRI, insertion of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line), and a lumbar puncture, all conducted in preparation for a planned medical evacuation to the United States, where a specialist medical team was reportedly on standby.
The notice was issued “without prejudice” to the parents’ rights and was signed by the law firm led by Kemi Pinheiro, SAN.
The solicitors stated that intravenous sedation using propofol was administered during the procedures.
However, during transportation to the cardiac catheterisation laboratory after the MRI, the child allegedly developed sudden and severe complications.
Despite being under sedation, he was said to have been transferred between clinical areas under conditions that raised “serious and substantive concerns” about compliance with patient-safety protocols.
He was later pronounced dead in the early hours of January 7.
The legal notice outlined several alleged lapses in paediatric anaesthetic and procedural care, including the following:
- Concerns over the appropriateness and cumulative dosing of propofol in a critically ill child
- Alleged inadequate airway protection during deep sedation
- Failure to ensure continuous physiological monitoring
- Transfer without supplemental oxygen, adequate monitoring, or sufficient accompanying medical personnel
- Questions regarding the availability of basic resuscitation equipmentAlleged delayed recognition and management of respiratory or cardiovascular compromise
The parents further alleged a general failure to comply with established paediatric anaesthesia, patient transfer, and safety protocols.
Another major grievance mentioned was the alleged failure of the hospital to adequately disclose the risks and potential side effects of propofol and other anaesthetic agents, which, according to the parents, undermined the legal requirement for informed consent.
The solicitors asserted that these alleged failures constituted prima facie breaches of duty of care, rendering the hospital and involved medical personnel liable for medical negligence resulting in the child’s death.
As part of the subsequent legal steps, the parents demanded certified copies of all medical records related to their son’s treatment within seven days of receiving the notice.
The requested documents include admission notes, consent forms, pre-anaesthetic assessments, anaesthetic charts, drug administration records, monitoring logs, procedural notes, nursing observations, ICU records, incident reports, and the identities of all medical staff involved.
They also requested internal reviews, MRI suite safety logs, and all related documentation. and all related documentation.
The hospital was further instructed to preserve all evidence, including CCTV footage, electronic monitoring data, pharmacy and drug inventory records, emergency equipment logs, internal communications, and any morbidity and mortality reviews.
READ ALSO: Chimamanda Adichie Ngozi Reportedly Loses 21-Month-Old Twin Son
The solicitors warned that any destruction, alteration, or loss of evidence after receipt of the notice would be treated as suppression of evidence and obstruction of justice, with corresponding legal consequences.
They added that failure to comply with the demands within the stipulated timeframe would compel the parents to pursue all available legal, regulatory, and judicial remedies against the hospital and all medical personnel involved.